1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 42 F.2d
  5. 42 F.2d 296 (1930)
 

THE KENTUCKIAN

42 F.2d 296 (1930)

THE KENTUCKIAN. THE MARY E. MESECK. THE JOHN ARBUCKLE.

District Court, S. D. New York.

April 21, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Park, Mattison & Lynch, of New York City (Henry E. Mattison, of New York City, of counsel), for libelant.

Foley & Martin, of New York City (J. A. Martin, of New York City, of counsel), for the Mary E. Meseck.

Palmer & Furman, of New York City (John K. Hartley, of New York City, of counsel), for the John Arbuckle.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

I find the Arbuckle solely to blame for the collision hereinafter described.

The libel will therefore be dismissed with costs to the Meseck, and the libelant may have an interlocutory decree against the Arbuckle.

The collision which is the subject-matter of this suit occurred in the Hudson River at about 6:30 a. m. on March 8, 1927, about six hundred or seven hundred feet off Pier 1.

It was daylight at the time. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases