IN RE ANDREWS

Patent Appeal No. 2271.

39 F.2d 284 (1930)

In re ANDREWS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 10, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel L. Morris, of Washington, D. C. (Louis Burgess, of New York City, Martin T. Fisher, of Washington, D. C., and Warren B. Hutchinson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the Examiner denying appellant's application for a patent for an alleged new, original, and ornamental design for gloves.

The application discloses a glove with an adjustable fastener at the wrist, consisting of a band or strap and two rings. In other respects, so far as we can see, the glove is of conventional design.

The references are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases