1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 233 (1930)
 

ELLIOTT ADDRESSING MACH. CO. v. WALLACE ADDRESSING MACH. CO.

No. 50-156.

39 F.2d 233 (1930)

ELLIOTT ADDRESSING MACH. CO. et al. v. WALLACE ADDRESSING MACH. CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

March 12, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. W. B. Brown, of New York City (William Nevarre Cromwell and S. Michael Pineles, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for motion for injunction.

W. Saxton Seward, of New York City (C. P. Goepel and E. Clarkson Seward, both of New York City, of counsel), opposed.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The preliminary injunction pendente lite for which the plaintiffs pray is granted.

I hold that the Fuller patent, No. 1,101,268, for stencils, which has been repeatedly held valid in this circuit, is infringed in respect of claims Nos. 1, 2, 13, 14, 15, 16, 23, and 24 by the stencils shown in the affidavits herein to have been made or caused to have been made by the defendant and sold by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases