1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 42 F.2d
  5. 42 F.2d 213 (1930)
 

ENAMELED METALS CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 4342.

42 F.2d 213 (1930)

ENAMELED METALS CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

July 9, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

S. Leo Ruslander, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Samuel Kaufman, of Pittsburgh, Pa., and George R. Beneman, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and John V. Groner and J. Louis Monarch, both of Washington, D. C. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and John Mac C. Hudson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The first question involved in this petition for review from the United States Board of Tax Appeals, namely, alleged error in passing on the question of abnormality, is decided against the petitioner in the case of Cramer & King Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (C. C. A.) 41 F.2d 24.

The second question involves the refusal of the Board to allow petitioner to amend its pleadings so...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases