SEABOLT v. UNITED STATES

No. 3074.

44 F.2d 169 (1930)

SEABOLT v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

October 28, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sam Lopinsky, of Charleston, W. Va. (D. L. Salisbury, of Charleston, W. Va., on the brief), for appellant.

James Damron, U. S. Atty., of Huntington, W. Va. (Philip Angel, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Huntington, W. Va., on the brief), for the United States.

Before NORTHCOTT, Circuit Judge, and GRONER and SOPER, District Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Two reasons are given on behalf of the appellant why the decision of the court below should be reversed: (1) That there was not sufficient evidence to justify the verdict of the jury; and (2) that the charge of the trial judge to the jury and his conduct of the case throughout was such that the defendant did not receive a fair trial. On the first point an inspection of the record shows conclusively that there was ample evidence upon which, if believed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases