1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 43 F.2d
  5. 43 F.2d 122 (1930)
 

ROYAL ELECTRIC CO. v. NOMA ELECTRIC CORPORATION

43 F.2d 122 (1930)

ROYAL ELECTRIC CO. et al. v. NOMA ELECTRIC CORPORATION.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 31, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City, for plaintiffs.

Morris Kirschstein, of New York City, for defendant.

BONDY, District Judge.

The court does not know any reason why a defendant cannot set up a counterclaim against one of several plaintiffs, in patent as well as other litigation. The motion to dismiss the counterclaim accordingly is denied. Should the counterclaim prejudice either party in the trial of the suit, the court, on motion, can order a separate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases