1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 38 F.2d
  5. 38 F.2d 104 (1930)
 

CHIDSEY v. LIPSCHITZ & PETERS

No. 13474.

38 F.2d 104 (1930)

CHIDSEY v. LIPSCHITZ & PETERS.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

February 14, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron Goldsmith, of Easton, Pa., and D. Alexander Wieland, Joseph J. Brown, and John Arthur Brown, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Smith & Paff and E. J. & J. W. Fox, all of Easton, Pa., and Umsted & Wolfe, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendants.

DICKINSON, District Judge.

This is an action at law. The number of transactions out of which the cause of action advanced arises, if at all, is so large that the separate paragraph averments of the statement of claim reach 115. Except for one feature (and this does not touch the ground of demurrer), the fact situation could be outlined in a few words. Generally speaking, the averments are of payment made by an impending bankrupt to creditors which the trustee in bankruptcy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases