1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 45 F.2d
  5. 45 F.2d 94 (1930)
 

MAATSCHAPPIJ TOT EXPLOITATIE, ETC. v. KOSLOFF

No. 316.

45 F.2d 94 (1930)

MAATSCHAPPIJ TOT EXPLOITATIE VAN RADEMAKER'S KONINKLIJKE CACAO & CHOCOLADEFADRIEKEN v. KOSLOFF et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

On Rehearing December 10, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mock & Blum, of New York City (Asher Blum, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

William Wallace White, of New York City (Archibald Cox, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.

MACK, Circuit Judge.

We adopt in substance statement of facts made by the learned District Judge as follows:

"Plaintiff, a Dutch corporation, brought this suit against defendants, who are selling agents in this country of another Dutch concern which manufactures in Holland a confection known as `Frank Rademaker's Hopjes,' in competition with a similar product made by plaintiff under the name of `Rademaker's Hopjes.'

"The complaint sets up two causes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases