STANDARD OIL CO. v. EPLEY

Patent Appeals Nos. 2355, 2356.

40 F.2d 997 (1930)

STANDARD OIL CO. (NEW JERSEY) v. EPLEY (two cases).

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 28, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Rogers, of New York City, and Thomas L. Mead, Jr., of Washington, D. C. (Browne & Phelps, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Charles L. Sturtevant, of Washington, D. C. (Sturtevant, Mason & Porter, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The above-numbered cases, without being formally consolidated, were briefed together and heard together. The issue is identical in both cases, and they may be disposed of in a single opinion.

The controversy grows out of the application by appellee for registration in the United States Patent Office of the coined word "EPCO" as a trade-mark for use on gasoline and oils. In one instance the drawing shows the word affixed upon the side...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases