TYPEWRITERS HILLIARDIZED v. CORONA TYPEWRITER CO.

No. 332.

43 F.2d 961 (1930)

TYPEWRITERS HILLIARDIZED, Inc., v. CORONA TYPEWRITER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

August 4, 1930.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin & Rendell, of Utica, N. Y. (Thomas as Ewing, of New York City, and Vernon M. Dorsey and Alan F. Garner, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York City (Wm. Houston Kenyon and Theodore S. Kenyon, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


CHASE, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff's patent was granted to Frederic W. Hilliard May 25, 1909. His original application was filed August 25, 1896. It was divided, and the patent in suit issued on the application filed November 18, 1904. No typewriters were made in accordance with the patent, and it expired before decision below.

Hilliard wanted to combine visibility in a typewriter with the wearing qualities then obtainable only in an invisible machine. He...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases