PER CURIAM.
1. No error assigned is supported by objection and exception duly saved. Appellant's admission to the arresting officer that he owned the still near which he was arrested was substantial evidence to support the conviction.
2. At the oral argument it is urged that there was double punishment. Appellant was convicted on count 3 alleging the possession of a still intended for use in making intoxicating liquor, and upon count 4 alleging the manufacture...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
