1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 33 F.2d
  5. 33 F.2d 949 (1929)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. SUN RAY NEON CORPORATION

No. 1594.

33 F.2d 949 (1929)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., et al. v. SUN RAY NEON CORPORATION et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

July 8, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bohleber & Ledbetter, of New York City, and George L. Grobe, of Buffalo, N. Y. (William Bohleber and Edwin J. Prindle, both of New York City, and Francis H. Fassett, of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Gifford, Scull & Burgess, of New York City, and J. William Ellis, of Buffalo, N. Y. (George F. Scull, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

HAZEL, District Judge.

Infringement by defendants corporate and individual is alleged in the bill, of letters patent No. 1,125,476, for system of illuminating by luminescent tubes, dated January 19, 1915.

The validity and scope of said patent has heretofore been adjudicated in Claude Neon Lights v. E. Machlett & Son, 27 F.2d 702, a decision by the Circuit Court of Appeals, and certiorari to review was denied by the Supreme...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases