1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 31 F.2d
  5. 31 F.2d 932 (1929)
 

HARLEY & LUND CORPORATION v. MURRAY RUBBER CO.

No. 244.

31 F.2d 932 (1929)

HARLEY & LUND CORPORATION v. MURRAY RUBBER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 1, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prentice & Townsend, of New York City (Robert Kelly Prentice, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Otterbourg, Steindler & Houston, Edwin M. Otterbourg, Edward F. Unger, and Charles A. Houston, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

There can be spelled out of the complaint a statement that the defendants induced the disclosure of the plaintiff's secrets upon the false representation that they intended to make a contract. This would fall within the decision of the Third Circuit in Rogers v. Virginia Carolina Chemical Co. (C. C. A.) 149 F. 1, and that of the English Court of Appeal in Edgington v. Fitzmaurice, L. R. 29 Ch. Div. 459. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases