1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 907 (1929)
 

BELLOWS-CLAUDE NEON CO. v. SUN RAY GAS CORPORATION

No. 2382.

39 F.2d 907 (1929)

BELLOWS-CLAUDE NEON CO. et al. v. SUN RAY GAS CORPORATION et al.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, E. D.

September 26, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith & Freeman, of Cleveland, Ohio (William Bohleber, of New York City, Harold Elno Smith and William L. Day, both of Cleveland, Ohio, and Edwin J. Prindle, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (Lloyd L. Evans and A. J. Hudson, both of Cleveland, Ohio, and George F. Scull, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

JONES, District Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of Claude patent 1,125,476, dated January 19, 1915, calling for a system of illuminating by luminescent tubes, the effective date of the invention of which being November 28, 1910, when the corresponding French patent 434,525, was filed. Invalidity and noninfringement are interposed as defenses. Injunction and accounting are prayed for. Exceptional conditions requiring it, the case was referred to a master for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases