GARDNER SIGN CO. v. CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, INC.

No. 2389.

36 F.2d 827 (1929)

GARDNER SIGN CO. v. CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., et al.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

December 10, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay and Byrnes, Stebbins, Parmelee & Blenko, all of Pittsburgh, Pa. (John G. Frazer, Arthur B. Van Buskirk, and Walter J. Blenko, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for plaintiff.

Brown & Critchlow and Joseph Stadtfeld, all of Pittsburgh, Pa., and Bohleber & Ledbetter, of New York City, for defendants.


SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

The plaintiff has filed an ancillary bill of complaint in this case, asking the court to enjoin the defendant from representing to the public, either in writing, or in public prints, or orally, that it has a monopoly on the Neon tube business, that the patent covers practically all Neon signs, and that the defendant be required to send out retraction letters to persons to whom letters have heretofore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases