GT. NORTHERN RY. v. MINNESOTA

Nos. 106 and 107.

278 U.S. 503 (1929)

GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. MINNESOTA. SAME v. SAME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided February 18, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. F.G. Dorety, with whom Mr. Thomas Balmer was on the brief, for plaintiff in error and appellant.

Mr. G.A. Youngquist, Attorney General of Minnesota, with whom Mr. Patrick J. Ryan was on the brief, for defendant in error and appellee.


Mr. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is here both by writ of error and appeal. Appeal being the proper method the writ of error (No. 106) will be dismissed.

The action was brought by the state to recover taxes for the years 1901 to 1912, inclusive. Judgment against the company was rendered by the trial court for the years 1903 to 1912, no recovery being allowed for 1901 or 1902. Upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases