1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 35 F.2d
  5. 35 F.2d 679 (1929)
 

CINCINNATI CAR CO. v. NEW YORK RAPID TRANSIT CORPORATION

No. 42.

35 F.2d 679 (1929)

CINCINNATI CAR CO. v. NEW YORK RAPID TRANSIT CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 2, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. A. Toulmin, of Washington, D. C. (H. A. Toulmin, Jr., of Washington, D. C., and C. C. Daniels, of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Harry E. Knight, of Washington, D. C. (William E. Knight, of New York City, on the brief), for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The first patent was for a vestibule between two cars in what is called an "articulated train." This means that the adjacent ends of each car on the train are carried by a single truck, thus avoiding the need of two trucks for each car, and requiring but one more truck for the train than there are cars. The patent discloses such a train (part of which is the subject of the third patent), but claims only certain features of the vestibule, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases