FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. v. BURDEN

Nos. 130, 131.

30 F.2d 610 (1929)

FIDELITY & DEPOSIT CO. OF MARYLAND v. BURDEN (two cases).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

February 4, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Aronstam, of New York City, for plaintiff in error.

Thomas E. White, of New York City, for defendant in error.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The obligations of Burden are to be ascertained from the terms of his applications. They were for supersedeas bonds, and it may be and indeed is argued that any such bonds, though to secure all the defendants, who appealed, would meet the terms of his applications. But such is an unreasonable interpretation of the acts of the parties. Burden was under no obligation to the other defendants,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases