1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 574 (1929)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. E. MACHLETT & SON

No. 137.

36 F.2d 574 (1929)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., v. E. MACHLETT & SON et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

On Rehearing, December 21, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarence E. Mehlhope, of Chicago, Ill., and Edwin J. Prindle and Bohleber & Ledbetter, all of New York City (Thomas Ewing and William Bohleber, both of New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

Dean S. Edmonds and William H. Davis, both of New York City (Leslie B. Young, of New York City, on the brief), for appellees.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is a sequel of the decision of this court upon another occasion [Claude Neon Lights v. E. Machlett & Son, 27 F.2d 702], in which the patent was held valid and infringed by the electrode there in suit. The general nature of the invention and its scope we then considered at length, and it is not necessary to repeat what we said. The supplemental bill was filed to bring within the claims another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases