SAKS v. HUDDLESTON

No. 4796.

36 F.2d 537 (1929)

SAKS et al. v. HUDDLESTON et ux.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 2, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert E. Steinem and Milton D. Korman, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs in error.

W. W. Millan and R. E. L. Smith, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


ROBB, Associate Justice.

This is a writ of error to the municipal court in an action to recover $245, and interest, balance on fur coat and fox scarf purchased by defendant's wife for the aggregate sum of $253, she having paid $8 on account.

The case was tried by the court, without a jury. The evidence for the plaintiffs was substantially as follows: They conduct a retail fur and apparel business in Washington. Mrs. Huddleston, defendant's wife, called at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases