1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 35 F.2d
  5. 35 F.2d 523 (1929)
 

UNITED STATES HOFFMAN MACH. CORP. v. PANTEX PRESSING MACH.

No. 644.

35 F.2d 523 (1929)

UNITED STATES HOFFMAN MACHINERY CORPORATION v. PANTEX PRESSING MACHINE, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

November 6, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave and Maxwell Barus (of Fish, Richardson & Neave), both of New York City, and Wm. G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Charles S. Jones and J. Granville Meyers, both of New York City, and Ward & Gray, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

MORRIS, District Judge.

The sole defense to this suit charging infringement of claims 2 and 5 of patent No. 1,193,093 to Weinberger and claims 2 and 4 of patent No. 1,326,982 to Spencer is want of invention in view of the state of the art. Both patents are for improvements in garment pressing machines of the general type that has been in use for more than a third of a century. This type has two padded press plates. The lower...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases