1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 34 F.2d
  5. 34 F.2d 508 (1929)
 

OVERMAN CUSHION TIRE CO. v. GOODYEAR TIRE & R. CO.

34 F.2d 508 (1929)

OVERMAN CUSHION TIRE CO., Inc., v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO., Inc.

District Court, S. D. New York.

September 10, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Byerly, of New York City (Robert W. Byerly and Arthur L. Kent, both of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Cooper, Kerr & Dunham, of New York City (Drury W. Cooper and Ernest D. Given, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

THACHER, District Judge (after stating the facts as above).

What Overman sought to accomplish was the construction of a cushion tire for vehicles which would avoid the outward bending of the load-bearing side walls, which must project well below the wheel flange so as to be freely responsive to absorb shock. Such tires have a tendency to bend or buckle under the shocks of travel usage, and the continuous distortion of the rubber into folds and bends quickly results...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases