1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 32 F.2d
  5. 32 F.2d 451 (1929)
 

FIREMEN'S INS. CO. v. BROOKS

No. 5194.

32 F.2d 451 (1929)

FIREMEN'S INS. CO. v. BROOKS et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 7, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Linton Martin, of Chattanooga, Tenn., and Theodore A. Hammond, of Atlanta, Ga. (Smith, Hammond & Smith, of Atlanta, Ga., and Miller, Miller & Martin, of Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief), for appellant.

Joe V. Williams, of Chattanooga, Tenn. (Henson W. Schoolfield, of Chattanooga, Tenn., on the brief), for appellees.

Before DENISON and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges, and NEVIN, District Judge.

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents the final phase of the controversy, considered by this court in another aspect in 19 F.2d 277. By the decree then affirmed, the District Court, in equity, had ordered a reformation of the policy so as to make Mr. and Mrs. Brooks jointly the insured; and in a suit upon the policy, when so reformed, the plaintiffs had a jury verdict and a judgment for the full amount. The present appeal presents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases