1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 34 F.2d
  5. 34 F.2d 399 (1929)
 

COYLE v. UNITED STATES

No. 17.

34 F.2d 399 (1929)

COYLE v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

September 3, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Q. A. Harrod and Laynie W. Harrod, both of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiff in error.

Roy St. Lewis, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl. (Herbert K. Hyde, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for the United States.

Before PHILLIPS and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal challenges the sufficiency of the information, upon the sole ground that it did not sufficiently identify the offense charged. The information in part alleged that the defendant, on January 22, 1927, in Oklahoma county, in the Western district of the state of Oklahoma, did unlawfully sell and deliver to Orival Snook intoxicating liquor, to wit, whisky. In the lower court, the attack on the information...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases