1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 33 F.2d
  5. 33 F.2d 366 (1929)
 

UNITED STATES v. ATLANTIC REFINING CO.

33 F.2d 366 (1929)

UNITED STATES v. ATLANTIC REFINING CO.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 8, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles H. Tuttle, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Harold F. Birnbaum, Sp. Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

John H. Stone and Howard M. Long, both of Philadelphia, Pa., Burlingham, Veeder, Fearey, Clark & Hupper, of New York City, Eugene Underwood, Jr., and Roscoe H. Hupper, both of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

THACHER, District Judge (after stating facts as above).

The designation of Smith's Bluff as the loading point fixed the primary obligation of the vessel to proceed there before announcing arrival and readiness to load. Until she "arrived," no obligation could arise to furnish cargo. But here, as in so many cases, the obligation to proceed to the place of loading is qualified by the phrase, "or as near thereunto as she may safely get (always afloat) and there load...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases