HERBRING v. LEE

No. 17.

280 U.S. 111 (1929)

HERBRING v. LEE, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF OREGON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 25, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas MacMahon presented the oral argument, and Messrs. Karl Herbring, pro se, and Guy E. Kelly filed a brief for appellant.

Messrs. I.H. Van Winkle, Attorney General of Oregon, and Willis S. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for appellee.


MR. JUSTICE SANFORD delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case arose under the Insurance Law of Oregon. 2 Oregon Laws, Tit. 36, §§ 6322 to 6604. Section 6388 of this Law provides, inter alia, as follows:

(1) "It shall be unlawful for any fire insurance company doing business in the state of Oregon to write, place or cause to be written or placed, any policy or contract for indemnity or insurance on property situated or located in the state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases