1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 35 F.2d
  5. 35 F.2d 1 (1929)
 

BASEBALL DISPLAY CO. v. STAR BALLPLAYER COMPANY

Nos. 4030, 4143.

35 F.2d 1 (1929)

BASEBALL DISPLAY CO., Inc., et al. v. STAR BALLPLAYER COMPANY, Inc. STAR BALLPLAYER CO., Inc., v. BASEBALL DISPLAY CO., Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Rehearing Denied October 17, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Heine & Laird, Lindabury & Steelman, Zink & Lafferty, all of Newark, N. J., M. Casewell Heine and Andrew Steelman, both of Newark, N. J., for appellant.

Thos. J. Johnston, of New York City, (J. Granville Meyers, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and RELLSTAB, District Judge.

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The District Court, having found the plaintiff's patent No. 1,321,940 valid and infringed (D. C.) 8 F.2d 46, referred the case to a master for accounting. After a sharp contest the master awarded the plaintiff $12,500 for profits, damages and interest. From the decree, which embodied the master's report without change, both parties have appealed; the plaintiff because the award is inadequate, the defendants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases