1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 33 F.2d
  5. 33 F.2d 300 (1929)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. MACHLETT & SON

No. 2465.

33 F.2d 300 (1929)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., v. E. MACHLETT & SON et al.

District Court, E. D. New York.

June 12, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bohleber & Ledbetter, of New York City (Edwin J. Prindle, Thomas Ewing, and William Bohleber, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City (William H. Davis, and Dean S. Edmonds, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendants.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is a motion for an injunction under a supplemental bill.

Patent No. 1,125,476 was held valid and infringed as to claim 1 by the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit, on the original appeal. 27 F.2d 702.

On a motion for a supplementary injunction after decree on mandate, on a button caesium electrode tube made by Rainbow Light, Inc., one of the defendants in the original suit, I made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases