1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 35 F.2d
  5. 35 F.2d 263 (1929)
 

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS v. AMERICAN NEON LIGHT CORPORATION

35 F.2d 263 (1929)

CLAUDE NEON LIGHTS, Inc., v. AMERICAN NEON LIGHT CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

January 26, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bohleber & Ledbetter, of New York City (Edwin J. Prindle, Thomas Ewing, and William Bohleber, all of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Charles J. Holland, of New York City, for defendants.

GODDARD, District Judge.

The plaintiff's patent has been held valid by the Circuit Court of Appeals of this circuit in Claude Neon Lights v. E. Machlett & Son, 27 F.2d 702, and the question presented here is whether the defendants' process infringes that of the plaintiff's, and the precise point is whether the defendants' tubes electrodes are deprived of occluded gases, within the meaning of claim 1 of the patent. Upon consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases