1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 232 (1929)
 

ELLIOTT ADDRESSING MACH. CO. v. ADDRESSING TYPEWRITER STENCIL CORPORATION

39 F.2d 232 (1929)

ELLIOTT ADDRESSING MACH. CO. et al. v. ADDRESSING TYPEWRITER STENCIL CORPORATION et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

July 16, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. W. B. Brown, of New York City (Wm. Nevarre Cromwell and S. Michael Pineles, both of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

James R. Brown, of New York City, for defendants.

KNOX, District Judge.

Upon the argument of the instant motion for a preliminary injunction against defendants' alleged infringement of certain claims of Fuller patent, No. 1,101,268, and Belknap patent, No. 1,256,509, counsel for defendants frankly stated that as to the first of these grants the only question before the court is as to whether "aluminum sulphate is a coagulant in that portion of the chemical field which is known as colloidal chemistry." If it be held...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases