1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 32 F.2d
  5. 32 F.2d 232 (1929)
 

ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. DAVIS

No. 5115.

32 F.2d 232 (1929)

ILLINOIS CENT. R. CO. v. DAVIS.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 10, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clinton H. McKay, of Memphis, Tenn. (Bond & Bond, of Jackson, Tenn., and Charles N. Burch and H. D. Minor, both of Memphis, Tenn., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.

R. E. Maiden, of Dresden, Tenn. (Morris & Morris, of Union City, Tenn., on the brief), for defendant in error.

Before MOORMAN, HICKENLOOPER, and KNAPPEN, Circuit Judges.

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff recovered damages for the killing of her husband, Louis Davis, by defendant's train at a public road crossing 237 rods south of the corporate limits of the town of Trimble, Tenn. The train was approaching the town from the south. The question on which the case turns here is whether subsection 3 of section 1574 of the Statutes of Tennessee applies. If it does, the judgment must be affirmed; if it does not, there should have been a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases