1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 128 (1929)
 

IN RE GILL

No. 2177.

36 F.2d 128 (1929)

In re GILL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 19, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cameron, Kerkam & Sutton, of Washington, D. C. (W. B. Kerkam and F. B. Smith, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler and Howard S. Miller, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the action of the Board of Appeals of the Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner rejecting Claim 6 and Claims 11 to 15, inclusive, made by appellant relative to claimed invention or inventions of "Improvements in Means for Assembling Internal Combustion Engines." It differs from suit No. 2176, In re Gill, 36 F.2d 126, in that 2176 constitutes a method application and this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases