1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 123 (1929)
 

BASSICK MFG. CO. v. ROGERS PRODUCTS CO.

39 F.2d 123 (1929)

BASSICK MFG. CO. et al. v. ROGERS PRODUCTS CO., Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey.

November 23, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fish, Richardson & Neave, of Boston, Mass., and Williams, Bradbury, McCaleb & Hinkle, of Chicago, Ill., for complainants.

Dean, Fairbank, Obrieght & Hirsch, of New York City, for defendant.

CLARK, District Judge.

Terrell, K. C., a leading English barrister specializing in patent causes, and the author of a brilliant treatise on the subject, made this observation during the argument of a case before the House of Lords (British Vacuum Cleaner Co. v. London & So. W. Ry., 29 R. P. C. [Eng.] 309, 318): "Subject matter is a question of fact, and is very difficult to decide, depending on the mechanical ability of the person who decides."

On that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases