1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 31 F.2d
  5. 31 F.2d 128 (1929)
 

STEIN FUR DYEING CO. v. WINDSOR FUR DYEING CO.

No. 3315.

31 F.2d 128 (1929)

STEIN FUR DYEING CO., Inc., v. WINDSOR FUR DYEING CO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. New York.

March 4, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward M. Evarts, of New York City (Richard B. Cavanagh, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Everett & Rook, of Newark, N. J. (Russell M. Everett and Harry B. Rook, both of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for defendant.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This is an action in equity based on the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,564,378, issued to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, for "Improvement in Bleached and Dyed Furs and the Like," dated December 8, 1925; and patent No. 1,573,200, issued to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, for "Process for Bleaching and Dyeing Furs and the Like," dated February 16, 1926; both of which patents have been assigned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases