1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 26 F.2d
  5. 26 F.2d 65 (1928)
 

RUSSELL v. UNITED STATES

No. 7819.

26 F.2d 65 (1928)

RUSSELL et al. v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

April 27, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ethelbert T. Barbour, of Oklahoma City, Okl., for plaintiffs in error.

Roy St. Lewis, U. S. Atty., of Oklahoma City, Okl. (William P. Kelley and Leslie E. Salter, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of Oklahoma City, Okl., on the brief), for the United States.

Before STONE and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges, and KENNEDY, District Judge.

KENNEDY, District Judge.

The plaintiffs in error, Ham Russell and Luther Jackson, who were defendants in the court below, were convicted under an indictment charging them with the violation of the Harrison Narcotic Act (26 USCA §§ 211, 691-707; Comp. St. § 6287g-6287q), in that, on or about the 26th day of May, 1926, in Logan county in the Western judicial district of Oklahoma, they did sell, barter, exchange, give away and deliver to Clarence Reed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases