1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 29 F.2d
  5. 29 F.2d 880 (1928)
 

SUNDBERG v. SCHMITT

No. 2086.

29 F.2d 880 (1928)

SUNDBERG et al. v. SCHMITT.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 3, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph H. Milans and Calvin T. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

E. S. Clarkson, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in an interference proceeding awarding priority of invention to the senior party.

The invention relates to an oil-saving or piston ring, and is defined in a single count, which it is unnecessary to reproduce.

The examiner of interferences ruled that appellants had established conception and disclosure of the invention as early as October, 1918, but that they had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases