MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The appellant, Thomson, is the junior party, his application having been filed while that of the appellee, Miller, was pending. A patent was inadvertently issued to Thomson, but this interference was later declared. Thomson, having alleged in his preliminary statement a date of conception subsequent to Miller's filing date, was placed under an order to show cause why judgment should not be rendered against him on the record. Thomson thereupon...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.