HUSAR v. UNITED STATES

No. 5297.

26 F.2d 847 (1928)

HUSAR v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fleming & Allman, of Shanghai, China, Alfred L. Bartlett, of Los Angeles, Cal., and Leo R. Friedman, of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

George Sellett, U. S. Atty. for China, of Shanghai, China (Geo. J. Hatfield, U. S. Atty., and T. J. Sheridan, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for the United States.

Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.


DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

The appellant was convicted in the United States Court for China upon an information charging, in one count the felonious destruction, and in another the corrupt disposition, of a bound volume of documentary evidence which had come into his possession in the course of an official investigation he, as United States attorney, was called upon to make of the conduct of the person to whom he corruptly delivered the documents.

The first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases