HURST, ANTHONY & WATKINS v. HEINER

No. 3315.

26 F.2d 734 (1928)

HURST, ANTHONY & WATKINS, Inc., v. HEINER, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

February 9, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Shaw & McClay, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for plaintiff.

J. D. Meyer, U. S. Atty., and W. J. Aiken, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Pittsburgh, Pa., and C. M. Charest, Jno. A. McCann, and Jno. H. Pigg, of the Bureau of Internal Revenue, all of Washington, D. C., for defendant.


SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

This is an action to recover income and profits taxes alleged to have been illegally collected for the calendar years 1917 and 1918. A jury trial was waived, and the case tried before the court without a jury.

The question involved is whether or not the plaintiff is properly classed as to the year 1917 under section 209 of the Revenue Act of 1917 (Comp. St. § 6336 3/8j), as a corporation "having no invested capital or not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases