1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 29 F.2d
  5. 29 F.2d 703 (1928)
 

CHIEF CONSOL. MIN. CO. v. MAMMOTH MIN. CO.

Nos. 8187, 8210.

29 F.2d 703 (1928)

CHIEF CONSOL. MIN. CO. v. MAMMOTH MIN. CO. OF NEVADA et al. MAMMOTH MIN. CO. OF UTAH v. CHIEF CONSOL. MIN. CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

November 24, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Jensen, of Salt Lake City, Utah (John A. Marshall, of Salt Lake City, Utah, B. S. Crow, of Los Angeles, Cal., A. M. Cheney, H. M. Stephens, and G. A. Marr, all of Salt Lake City, Utah, on the brief), for Chief Consol. Min. Co.

Mahlon E. Wilson, of Salt Lake City, Utah, for Mammoth Min. Co. of Nevada.

A. L. Hoppaugh, Robert E. Mark, Frank A. Johnson, and Charles C. Dey, all of Salt Lake City, Utah, for Mammoth Min. Co. of Utah.

Before VAN VALKENBURGH and COTTERAL, Circuit Judges, and REEVES, District Judge.

VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judge.

The litigation of which the controversy now before us forms a part has been long continued and has involved several phases. The appellee Mammoth Mining Company of Nevada is the owner of four lode mining claims in the Tintic mining district of Utah known as the First Northern Extension of the Mammoth, the Jenkins, the Golden King, and the Bradley. Appellant Chief Consolidated Mining Company in the same district owns two claims, the Silveropolis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases