1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 26 F.2d
  5. 26 F.2d 609 (1928)
 

ISENBERG v. TRENT TRUST CO.

No. 5193.

26 F.2d 609 (1928)

ISENBERG et al. v. TRENT TRUST CO., Limited.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 21, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Francis Neylan, of San Francisco, Cal., and Barry S. Ulrich, of Honolulu, Hawaii (Grove J. Fink, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellants.

Oscar Sutro and Renato Capocelli, both of San Francisco, Cal. (Smith, Warren, Stanley & Vitousek, of Honolulu, Hawaii, and Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, of San Francisco, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GILBERT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

The controversy involves the liability of the appellee to account for 670 shares of the capital stock of the Kekaha Sugar Company, reported by the appellee to have been sold under the act known as the Trading with the Enemy Act, by the Alien Property Custodian, as property of beneficiaries of the estate of Otto Isenberg, deceased. The circuit court found that the stock was part of the trust estate, and that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases