PRINCE v. CHILDS CO.

No. 120.

23 F.2d 605 (1928)

PRINCE v. CHILDS CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 9, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reynolds & Goodwin, of New York City (John Reynolds, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Barber, Fackenthal & Giddings, of New York City (Joseph Diehl Fackenthal, of New York City, of counsel), for Childs Co.

Charles Franklin, of New York City (Charles L. Minor, of New York City, of counsel), for Stone, Prosser & Doty.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.


AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

We can discover no justification for the intervention of Stone, Prosser & Doty. The main suit was to compel the issue to the plaintiff of a certificate for her stock and the payment to her of all unpaid dividends. No alternative relief was asked to recover damages for conversion, and no attempt was made to ratify the sale of the forged certificate and follow the proceeds. The bill relied solely...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases