MELDRAM v. CURTIS & BRO.

No. 12128.

29 F.2d 582 (1928)

MELDRAM v. CURTIS & BRO., Inc.

District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

December 11, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gibbons & Whitaker, of Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

L. M. Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


DICKINSON, District Judge.

Had this cause been tried in the state court, the motion would have been one for judgment in favor of the defendant n. o. v. Such a motion would meet the practical situation, because, if the argument for the defendant is accepted and following it the present rule is made absolute, it would logically lead upon a new trial to binding instructions for the defendant. The real question is whether the case should have been submitted to the jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases