MARTIN, Chief Justice.
Shultz is the senior party. Lovejoy, the junior party, denies that Shultz is entitled to make the counts of the interference, claiming that the Shultz structure, as disclosed in the application, is inoperative and utterly lacking in usefulness.
The issue is stated in four counts, of which count 1 is illustrative, reading as follows, to wit:
"1. A shock absorber adapted to be arranged between two relatively movable members, comprising...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
