SOUTHERN PACIFIC v. HAGLUND

Nos. 472, 473.

277 U.S. 304 (1928)

SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. HAGLUND, ADMINISTRATRIX, ET AL. SAME v. MOORE SHIPBUILDING COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 21, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Wm. Denman submitted for petitioner.

Mr. Ira S. Lillick, with whom Mr. Hunt C. Hill was on the briefs, submitted for the respondents, Moore Shipbuilding Company and Hildur Haglund, Administratrix.

Mr. J.F. Sullivan, with whom Messrs. Edward I. Barry and Theodore J. Roche were on the brief, submitted for the respondent, Rolph Navigation & Coal Company.


MR. JUSTICE SANFORD delivered tile opinion of the Court.

These two suits in admiralty, which were brought in the federal court for northern California, arose out of a collision between the ferryboat Thoroughfare and the steamship Enterprise in charge of the tug Relief, in the channel of San Antonio Creek, known as the Oakland Estuary, which resulted in damages to the Thoroughfare and the Enterprise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases