MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. JONES

No. 5366.

27 F.2d 521 (1928)

MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. JONES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 2, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John Ralph Wilson and W. G. Bonta, both of San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff in error.

Nat Schmulowitz and Ernest L. Brune, both of San Francisco, Cal., for defendant in error.

Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and HUNT, Circuit Judges.


RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

This was an action at law on an indemnity bond. By written stipulation of the parties, the case was tried before the court below without the intervention of a jury. The court made elaborate special findings, and entered judgment thereon in favor of the plaintiff. That judgment is now here for review. All the assignments of error are based upon the insufficiency of the testimony to support the special...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases