MUST HATCH INCUBATOR CO. v. PATTERSON

Nos. 8953, 341-E.

27 F.2d 447 (1928)

MUST HATCH INCUBATOR CO., Inc., v. PATTERSON, Governor of Oregon, et al. SAME v. HARTLEY, Governor of Washington, et al.

District Court, D. Oregon, District Court, W. D. Washington, S. D.

May 14, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dey, Hampson & Nelson, of Portland, Or., and Bogle, Bogle & Gates, of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs.

I. H. Van Winkle, Atty. Gen., and Willis S. Moore, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants Patterson and others.

John H. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., and B. B. Adams, Asst. Atty. Gen., for defendants Hartley and others.

Before GILBERT, Circuit Judge, and BEAN and CUSHMAN, District Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Alleging them to be in violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution, these suits were brought, one in Oregon and the other in Washington, to enjoin and restrain the enforcement of board or department regulations of the respective states, prohibiting the shipment or bringing into those states of baby chicks, unless accompanied by an official health certificate showing that they are, and have come, from parent stock which has been found free from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases