1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 28 F.2d
  5. 28 F.2d 407 (1928)
 

RUCKSTELL SALES & MFG. CO. v. PERFECTO GEAR DIFFERENTIAL CO.

No. 1621. No. K-31-J.

28 F.2d 407 (1928)

RUCKSTELL SALES & MFG. CO. v. PERFECTO GEAR DIFFERENTIAL CO. RUCKSTELL SALES & MFG. CO. v. STARR TRANSMISSION CORPORATION et al.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D., District Court, S. D. California, S. D.

October 5, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. E. Townsend and Wm. A. Loftus, both of San Francisco, Cal., B. M. Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Benjamin F. Bledsoe, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Charles S. Evans, John H. Miller, A. W. Boyken, and Chas. O. Bruce, all of San Francisco, Cal., and Raymond Ives Blakeslee, of Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants.

JAMES, District Judge.

On exceptions by defendants to report of special master recommending decree in favor of plaintiff.

The above-entitled causes were brought, one in the Northern district of California and one in the Southern district.

In the Northern district case, the Perfecto Gear Differential Company is the sole defendant. Plaintiff in that case set up first a cause of action for breach of a patent license contract. It was there charged that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases