1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 29 F.2d
  5. 29 F.2d 313 (1928)
 

MARVEL EQUIPMENT CO. v. MERIT OIL EQUIPMENT CO.

Nos. 4959, 4960.

29 F.2d 313 (1928)

MARVEL EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. MERIT OIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY. MERIT OIL EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. MARVEL EQUIPMENT COMPANY.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

November 10, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chas. L. Byron and Henry M. Huxley, both of Chicago, Ill., for Marvel Equipment Co.

Charles E. Brock, of Cleveland, Ohio (Hull, Brock & West, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for Merit Oil Co.

Frank E. Liverance, Jr., of Grand Rapids, Mich., amicus curiæ.

Before DENISON, MACK, and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The patents in suit and the alleged infringing devices are fully described in the opinion of the District Court. We are of opinion that defendant had the equivalent of the patentee's depending guide but Haines No. 959,216 did not have it, and we also agree with the other conclusions of the District Court.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases