1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 28 F.2d
  5. 28 F.2d 283 (1928)
 

STANDARD OIL CO. v. CALIFORNIA PEACH & FIG GROWERS

No. 651.

28 F.2d 283 (1928)

STANDARD OIL CO. v. CALIFORNIA PEACH & FIG GROWERS, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware.

October 1, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward S. Rogers, of New York City, and William G. Mahaffy, of Wilmington, Del., for plaintiff.

A. W. Boyken (of Miller & Boyken), of San Francisco, Cal., and James I. Boyce, of Wilmington, Del., for defendant.

MORRIS, District Judge.

The basic question here presented is one of trade-mark infringement. "Nujol," a coined, arbitrary word, was adopted, used, and registered by the plaintiff in the year 1915 as its trademark for refined mineral oil for use in the treatment of constipation. Three subsequent registrations for other uses have been made. Between the time of its adoption and the end of 1926, the plaintiff sold more than 27,000,000 bottles so labeled, and by the end...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases